bloggie

sunday, april 20, 2014 1:16 am zst

We can always panic tomorrow.

hyperlinkopotamus

evariste left a comment at 2:21 pm 04/17
evariste left a comment at 2:17 pm 04/17
franco cbi left a comment at 2:54 pm 04/12
kianb left a comment at 11:55 am 04/06
franco cbi left a comment at 5:53 pm 04/04
packen left a comment at 5:23 am 04/07
zorkmidden is also here
Thousand Sons left a comment at 2:21 pm 04/09
packen, Pamela, The Honorable Rick Santorum, elloryallaire, evariste, zorkmidden, and franco cbi have also commented
zorkmidden left a comment at 8:14 pm 03/20
franco cbi left a comment at 11:34 am 03/20
Cam and evariste have also commented
Posted by evariste on Feb 25, 2013 2:44 pm

1 comment

#1 evariste at 2:45 pm on Feb 25, 2013

And now, one of these other matters seeped to the surface: the bank had known for years about the impact of commodities speculation on food prices and the havoc it wreaked on people in poor countries. And it had lied to the German Parliament about it.

On June 27, 2012, David Folkerts-Landau, head of Deutsche Bank’s DB Research, educated a parliamentary commission about the dire consequences of food price inflation—and what didn’t cause it.

“In developing countries where often up to 90% of the income must be spent on food,” he said, “price increases of wheat, corn, and soybeans in the years 2007-2008 and 2010-2011 had devastating consequences.” Volatility made it worse. “Even spikes of only a few months are a serious threat to food security.”

While the volume of options and derivatives in agricultural markets had been ballooning in recent years, “primarily in search of higher yields,” he said, there was “hardly any sound empirical evidence” for the assertion that any of it “led to price increases or higher volatility.”

He cited the big players. The US Commodity and Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) had received “no reliable economic analysis” that showed that excessive speculation influenced the markets. US Department of Agriculture came to the same conclusion in 2009. And the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) pointed out as early as 2007 that there was “no convincing causal relationship” between speculation and price increases. That the BIS would say that makes sense: it groups together 58 central banks, including the most prodigious money printers. On its board: Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, NY Fed President William Dudley, ECB President Mario Draghi, etc. etc.

Thus inspired, Folkerts-Landau concluded that “commodity prices are primarily determined by fundamental demand and supply factors,” not speculation.

Alas, foodwatch, an independent non-profit, has obtained four studies by DB Research and two studies by German insurance and finance conglomerate Allianz that showed that both companies had known for years that commodity speculation—one of their major business activities—drove up food prices.

In September, 2009, a DB Research study pointed out: “Speculation has also contributed to price increases.”

A year later, DB Research found that speculation could be “distorting the normal functioning of the market,” which “can have grave consequences for farmers and consumers and is in principle unacceptable.” It argued that it was important for the proper “functioning of the food chain” that commodity derivatives serve their original purpose of price discovery and hedging against volatility.

And it suggested that more regulation of derivatives would “be helpful in avoiding excesses.”
In January, 2011, DB Research—shocked that high food prices had at least in part triggered social unrest in a number of countries in Latin America, Asia, and Africa—admitted that “in some instances speculation might have added to the price movement.”

Two months later, DB Research acknowledged that in developing countries where “consumers spend over 50% of their income on food,” price increases can be devastating and “hollow out the right to food.” While there was no consensus on the role of derivatives, the study nevertheless fingered speculation: “When speculation drives prices to a level that is no longer consistent with fundamental data, this can have serious consequences for farmers and consumers.”

Hence another scandal: large banks have known for years that commodities speculation and related products that they sold to their clients caused immense damage to people in developing countries and hurt people even in rich countries. foodwatch points out that even short price spikes can cause permanent damage to already mal-nourished children—and can lead to death. Yet banks “deceive the public, even lie to Parliament, to continue without scruples to profit at the expense of those who are starving.”

recent comments

Confused because the characters all look alike and there are so many? Here's a handy guide.
' Gabriel García Márquez, the Colombian novelist whose “One Hundred Years of Solitude” established him as a giant of
' British Pathé was one of the leading producers of newsreels and documentaries during the 20th Century. This week,
From a few months ago, but interesting.
[ #27 ]/ evariste [ #17 ]/ franco cbi: had to try that Google search
[ Hopefully, HBO follows Obamacare's suit and extends the premiere until April 15. ]/
' Former President Jimmy Carter yesterday said he is supportive of letting a known member of a terrorist group,
[ #30 ]/ Pamela: Good idea.
That is what I get for posting in a hockey forum about health care at the same time. Sorry to
_ Blog-gie has a Goo-gle prob-lem... _ [img]
[ #19 ]/ zorkmidden: I did that too. [img] I find I can handle the more disturbing bits better
[ #17 ]/ franco cbi: had to try that Google search to find out why that's such a popular
Typical teabagger idiocy.
You guys are really scraping the bottom of the barrel now Pamela.
But seriously, I think that [ this ]/ is the link that you intended to post (since it is the
I'm happy that our nation's hockey teams are getting the healthcare that they deserve.
[ This is creepy. ]/ ' How many more healthcare coverage applications of unsuspecting Americans
[img]
[ GoT catchup summary. ]/ Everything that's happened in the three seasons so far.
' Game of Thrones, which enters its fourth season this month, may be heading toward its second massive problem,
' The show has won 10 Emmys (out of 40 nominations) and counts President Obama among its fans. Asked
[ Posted a thread about season 4. ]/ No worries, no spoilers.
' As Game of Thrones begins its fourth season, David Benioff and D. B. Weiss, the creators of HBO’s
But at least I know what happens to two characters I feel intensely about (I won't reveal who they are
I did cheat and read the Wiki about the series and the characters but it was very unsatisfying not knowing

home

this & that

bloggie pulse: circulation
last 15 minutes:
27
last hour:
66
last 24 hours:
745
bloggie pulse: comments
since midnite:
0
last 24 hours:
0
in our lifetime:
5156