Times have changed so much that some high school teachers of sex education are beginning to show triple-X porn movies to their students in order to depict techniques of satisfactory intercourse.
I'm not sure I believe that.
#2Right Wing Conspirator
at 7:23 pm on Jan 06, 2008
Times have changed so much that some high school teachers of sex education are beginning to show triple-X porn movies to their students in order to depict techniques of satisfactory intercourse.
I'm not sure I believe that.
Every class that I signed up for, well, I was highly disappointed.
Seriously, yeah, I would say BS on that. Maybe there have been one or two cases but nothing 'mainstrea.'
Times have changed so much that some high school teachers of sex education are beginning to show triple-X porn movies to their students in order to depict techniques of satisfactory intercourse.
I'm not sure I believe that.
Which part don't you believe -- that sex-ed teachers have shown triple-X films in the classroom, or that porn depicts techniques of satisfactory intercourse?
13 comments, latest by greenmamba at 8:58 am 1/7
Every class that I signed up for, well, I was highly disappointed.
Seriously, yeah, I would say BS on that. Maybe there have been one or two cases but nothing 'mainstrea.'
Well, I haven't raped anybody since internet pron was invented.
LOL. I can join your club also.
LOL!!
Keyword, or should I say, weasel word, is "some".
Which part don't you believe -- that sex-ed teachers have shown triple-X films in the classroom, or that porn depicts techniques of satisfactory intercourse?
If pr0n were used in our schools sex ed programs, I'd be very hesitant to let my sons work as pizza delivery boys.
What about plumbers?
But on the bright side, "the jobs Americans will not do" would be filled within a day.
Even vampirism, as a career, is not safe from the corrupting influence of pr0n...
-click below for full size-:

(The linked synopsis for this video notes that it was possibly the very last gay pr0n film to be shot on actual FILM.)
Dt'Amato might well have a point here but he tends to suffer massive logic lapses and Bagel would call him a JHFNPOS or something like that.
He ends an analysis of UNSCR 1701 with this:
and follows up in the comments withHe forgets that according to Jewish teaching, they own the whole shebang.
We don't need lawyer's with 'tudes.
PS: I might have posted on him before. Sorry if this is repetition but I suffer from DDS.