You know that nutball who took hostages at the NH Hillary campaign office Friday afternoon? Turns out he was a convicted rapist released from a Massachusetts prison. The Boston Herald’s Michele McPhee reports:
Executive Office of Public Safety spokesman Terrill Walker told me Eisenberg walked out of MCI-Concord in March 2005 after serving his entire 10-to-20-year sentence.
While Walker would not say what that sentence was for, Department of Correction sources said Eisenberg was a rapist who was let out and rearrested several times for petty crimes. That would make him the second Bay State con released under questionable circumstances to be nabbed for another heinous crime last month.
It’s a pattern:
Daniel Tavares, the butcher who hacked his own mother to death in 1991 and became a violent prisoner behind bars, is charged with executing a young newlywed couple in Washington state on Nov. 17, months after getting out of prison. Tavares was still facing two charges of assaulting prison guards, but was freed when Worcester Superior Court Judge Kathe Tuttman overturned a lower court’s bail and released him on personal recognizance.
What about 26-year-old Dorchester ex-con Michael “Stix” Addison, who is now facing the death penalty for assassinating a Manchester, N.H., police officer with a single bullet to the head last year? The slain cop, Officer Michael Briggs, was allegedly killed by the Massachusetts ex-con who was 16 the first time he tried to kill someone, according to his long rap sheet.
In that attack, he pointed a gun at a classmate and pulled the trigger - twice. The gun misfired. Then, a day after his 17th birthday in 1997, Addison knifed a basketball player in Roxbury. He was charged with assault and battery with intent to murder and armed assault and tried as a result.
A judge sentenced him to a whopping three years, freeing Addison again in 2000. He violated his probation four months later, according to court records, but was never put back in prison. Briggs, one of Manchester’s Finest, paid the ultimate price for the lax attention paid to Addison’s violent rap sheet.
Springfield police Officer David Askins was shot in March by a New York City fugitive who had been hiding from the law by settling in western Massachusetts after he jumped bail in New York on a slew of charges. Why wouldn’t the fugitive, Aaron Breevort, hide out here? Just weeks before Breevort shot Askins, he was arrested, but a brilliant judge released him on bail and told him to surrender in New York on his own honor, a law enforcement source told me.
Sound familiar? Judge Tuttman gave similar instructions to Tavares before that savage fled the state and allegedly killed Brian and Beverly Mauck.
...on a related note, Deval's Rapist Pen Pal wants a get out of jail free card...
#2Right Wing Conspirator
at 7:33 am on Dec 04, 2007
Actually convicted of rape twice, at least. The first time he escaped a year into his sentence.
Patrick called 9-11 "a failure of human understanding". While that's an utterly idiotic statement, it's not the same as saying the ~3000 victims of 9/11 "deserved it".
Patrick called 9-11 "a failure of human understanding". While that's an utterly idiotic statement, it's not the same as saying the ~3000 victims of 9/11 "deserved it".
The man could not bring himself to blame mass murder on Islamonazis. In other words, it was our fault as much as theirs. Governor Patrick is a vile, morally depraved scumbag.
There is simply no refuting this unless you wear a brownshirt, a swastika, and/or a keffiyeh.
Well, you never saw what was below the desk, did you?
Cronkite lied about Tet, and as a result, we mistakenly withdrew, and the Communists won and murdered millions. The man is guilty of complicity in genocide. May he rot in hell (I assume he's nominally Christian) for all eternity.
Executive Office of Public Safety spokesman Terrill Walker told me Eisenberg walked out of MCI-Concord in March 2005 after serving his entire 10-to-20-year sentence.
While Walker would not say what that sentence was for, Department of Correction sources said Eisenberg was a rapist who was let out and rearrested several times for petty crimes. That would make him the second Bay State con released under questionable circumstances to be nabbed for another heinous crime last month.
It does not seem questionable to me to release a man at the end of his prison sentence. Now, when he was rearrested for petty crimes unspecified, it seems to me that he probably should have served additional time because of his record(unless it was for littering or somesuch).
Executive Office of Public Safety spokesman Terrill Walker told me Eisenberg walked out of MCI-Concord in March 2005 after serving his entire 10-to-20-year sentence.
While Walker would not say what that sentence was for, Department of Correction sources said Eisenberg was a rapist who was let out and rearrested several times for petty crimes. That would make him the second Bay State con released under questionable circumstances to be nabbed for another heinous crime last month.
It does not seem questionable to me to release a man at the end of his prison sentence. Now, when he was rearrested for petty crimes unspecified, it seems to me that he probably should have served additional time because of his record(unless it was for littering or somesuch).
I got the impression that the later offenses were parole violations that weren't enforced, although the article isn't very clear. Likewise, what does "end of a 10-20 year sentence" mean? Did he serve 10? 20? Was the sentence reduced by a parole board?
23 comments, latest by papijoe at 9:35 am 12/4
...on a related note, Deval's Rapist Pen Pal wants a get out of jail free card...
Actually convicted of rape twice, at least. The first time he escaped a year into his sentence.
And it will get even worse with that radical America-hating, Jew-hating leftist Deval Patrick as Governor.
A man who thinks those who died on 9-11 deserved it.
Huh?
Go back and google what Deval Patrick said this past 9-11. The man is an Islamonazi-loving, morally depraved, piece of shit.
WHo are you, Rosie O'Donnell?
Rosie would have supported Herr/Comrade Patrick, not me.
Papijoe will back me on this one.
Patrick called 9-11 "a failure of human understanding". While that's an utterly idiotic statement, it's not the same as saying the ~3000 victims of 9/11 "deserved it".
The man could not bring himself to blame mass murder on Islamonazis. In other words, it was our fault as much as theirs. Governor Patrick is a vile, morally depraved scumbag.
There is simply no refuting this unless you wear a brownshirt, a swastika, and/or a keffiyeh.
WHat if I wear all three?
You'd be given your own talk show on CNN.
Maybe, but I'm pretty sure that they'd make me wear pants, in addition to the brownshirt, keffiyeh, and swastika, so I think I'll pass.
But then you'd lose your shot at a date with Anderson Cooper.
So when will the Islamocomminazis tumble a wall on Anderson Cooper? Or does CNN's j-o-o-o-o- hatred trump that, too?
Well, that will be done after they use it to crush Wolf Blitzer to death, obviously.
On the other hand, maybe not. Walter Cronkite didn't wear pants for the entire time he was anchor on CBS News.
Is that true?
Well, you never saw what was below the desk, did you?
Cronkite lied about Tet, and as a result, we mistakenly withdrew, and the Communists won and murdered millions. The man is guilty of complicity in genocide. May he rot in hell (I assume he's nominally Christian) for all eternity.
Are you saying that only Christians go to hell?
I'm saying he's a mass murderer who should go there is he believes it exists.
It does not seem questionable to me to release a man at the end of his prison sentence. Now, when he was rearrested for petty crimes unspecified, it seems to me that he probably should have served additional time because of his record(unless it was for littering or somesuch).
It does not seem questionable to me to release a man at the end of his prison sentence. Now, when he was rearrested for petty crimes unspecified, it seems to me that he probably should have served additional time because of his record(unless it was for littering or somesuch).
I got the impression that the later offenses were parole violations that weren't enforced, although the article isn't very clear. Likewise, what does "end of a 10-20 year sentence" mean? Did he serve 10? 20? Was the sentence reduced by a parole board?