bloggie

We were already halfway through our meals when she arrived. After a minute or two of eating in silence, one of my friends stabbed his spoon violently into his pile of mashed potatoes and left it there.
“Man, I can’t eat like this,” he said.
“Like what?” I said. “Chow hall food getting to you?”
“No—with that fucking freak behind us!” he exclaimed, loud enough for not only her to hear us, but everyone at the surrounding tables. I looked over at the woman, and she was intently staring into each forkful of food before it entered her half-melted mouth.
“Are you kidding? I think she’s fucking hot!” I blurted out.
“What?” said my friend, half-smiling.
“Yeah man,” I continued. “I love chicks that have been intimate—with IEDs. It really turns me on—melted skin, missing limbs, plastic noses . . . .”
“You’re crazy, man!” my friend said, doubling over with laughter. I took it as my cue to continue.
“In fact, I was thinking of getting some girls together and doing a photo shoot. Maybe for a calendar? ‘IED Babes.’ We could have them pose in thongs and bikinis on top of the hoods of their blown-up vehicles.”
My friend was practically falling out of his chair laughing. The disfigured woman slammed her cup down and ran out of the chow hall, her half-finished tray of food nearly falling to the ground.

I am pretty sure that this SOB would be throttled if this happened. Which I don't think it did.

More at the Weekly Standard.

Fact or Fiction?

About six months into our deployment, we were assigned a new area to patrol, southwest of Baghdad. We spent a few weeks constructing a combat outpost, and, in the process, we did a lot of digging. At first, we found only household objects like silverware and cups. Then we dug deeper and found children’s clothes: sandals, sweatpants, sweaters. Like a strange archeological dig of the recent past, the deeper we went, the more personal the objects we discovered. And, eventually, we reached the bones. All children’s bones: tiny cracked tibias and shoulder blades. We found pieces of hands and fingers. We found skull fragments. No one cared to speculate what, exactly, had happened here, but it was clearly a Saddam-era dumping ground of some sort.

One private, infamous as a joker and troublemaker, found the top part of a human skull, which was almost perfectly preserved. It even had chunks of hair, which were stiff and matted down with dirt. He squealed as he placed it on his head like a crown. It was a perfect fit. As he marched around with the skull on his head, people dropped shovels and sandbags, folding in half with laughter. No one thought to tell him to stop. No one was disgusted. Me included.

The private wore the skull for the rest of the day and night. Even on a mission, he put his helmet over the skull. He observed that he was grateful his hair had just been cut—since it would make it easier to pick out the pieces of rotting flesh that were digging into his head.

I know another private who really only enjoyed driving Bradley Fighting Vehicles because it gave him the opportunity to run things over. He took out curbs, concrete barriers, corners of buildings, stands in the market, and his favorite target: dogs. Occasionally, the brave ones would chase the Bradleys, barking at them like they bark at trash trucks in America—providing him with the perfect opportunity to suddenly swerve and catch a leg or a tail in the vehicle’s tracks. He kept a tally of his kills in a little green notebook that sat on the dashboard of the driver’s hatch. One particular day, he killed three dogs. He slowed the Bradley down to lure the first kill in, and, as the diesel engine grew quieter, the dog walked close enough for him to jerk the machine hard to the right and snag its leg under the tracks. The leg caught, and he dragged the dog for a little while, until it disengaged and lay twitching in the road. A roar of laughter broke out over the radio. Another notch for the book. The second kill was a straight shot: A dog that was lying in the street and bathing in the sun didn’t have enough time to get up and run away from the speeding Bradley. Its front half was completely severed from its rear, which was twitching wildly, and its head was still raised and smiling at the sun as if nothing had happened at all.

Baaaahuuuuulllllsssshhhheeeetttt.

Oh, never mind, I see he's already spoke his mind on this issue. Two hours ago.

Bah-KAWK!!

But I

have more

comments.

What did he say, something about Throbert?

Ed thought Throbert should be careful about what he says about TNR, as it may not be difficult to figure out who he is if someone should see his nic at LGF.

Concerned about retaliation, I presume.

Ah, FFS. Doesn't he think Throbert has already considered it?

Fortunately, Rugby the Rat's LGF account is still active.

I really really doubt that anyone at TNR is going to be checking the comments at LGF or Bloggie, but better safe than sorry.

Hey, is there anything you've said here that you'd like me to nuke and/or pseudonymize?

Hee hee... I just saw the comment. Moran.

That actually started out as a typo, but instead of correcting it I decided to leave it as a double-entendre.

ev, I guess you might as well change the attribution on the "Stephen Glass redux at TNR?" thread just so that "(Th)robert McGee" isn't associated with it.

RWC's chicken has the magic touch, I have to admit.

Done. Comments too?

Of course, you could borrow one of Glen Greenwald(s)'s sockpuppets.

Yeah, I guess so, since in some of the comments I refer to being present in the TNR offices.

I anagrams.

Anagram Man.

'Be ot or bot ne ot, tath is the nestquie!'

Actually, Brendan's Online Anagram Generator came up with BETH ROTC MERGE among its 237 suggestions, and then I fiddled with it a bit more.

(My real name anagrams to "Egret comber," among other phrases.)

Hmmm... one anagram of my name (as it appears on my birth certificate and driver's licence):

A FUCKER SIR? OR NO?

Hey! I like it!

I don't see what's so cool.

Uh, he has already gotten to me -

DEFEND ROVE I IS

TNR is doing the honorable thing.

07.20.07

NOTE TO READERS:

Several conservative blogs have raised questions about the Diarist "Shock Troops," written by a soldier in Iraq using the pseudonym Scott Thomas. Whenever anybody levels serious accusations against a piece published in our magazine, we take those charges seriously. Indeed, we're in the process of investigating them. I've spoken extensively with the author of the piece and have communicated with other soldiers who witnessed the events described in the diarist. Thus far, these conversations have done nothing to undermine--and much to corroborate--the author's descriptions. I will let you know more after we complete our investigation.

--Franklin Foer
posted 4:50 p.m.

RT - "We take serious allegations seriously"

Excellent!

Thus far, these conversations have done nothing to undermine--and much to corroborate--the author's descriptions. I will let you know more after we complete our investigation.

These conversations...

Did I mention that I'm going to Frank Foer's house for a party at 8:00 tonight?

Heh. Have a super time, Beth.

He's gonna lock the doors and not let anyone out until someone admits that "I'm Beth Greem, ROTC from Bloggie".

I'm Beth Greem, ROTC...I'm Beth Greem, ROTC...

I really want to know what kind of follow-up questions he's asking this "Scott Thomas" prick.

W gets that investigation tomorrow.

#334 Memphis Bill

Yeah, they're carrying on conversations---with people they don't name. So, why should we trust these "conversations", if they won't name names, or show us they've verified these "conservations" with actual evidence, from other sources? They won't even print the "conversations" they've had; we're just supposed to believe whatever they tell us.

Isn't conversations just another word for, "gossip?" (And, yes, airforcewife, up their own asses is definitely where they're looking.)