bloggie

monday, september 1, 2014 4:27 pm zst

Is it good news? Nope, just fucking carrots

hyperlinkopotamus

zorkmidden left a comment at 6:57 pm 08/31
packen, franco cbi, and evariste have also commented
franco cbi left a comment at 5:45 am 08/30
evariste is also here
franco cbi left a comment at 6:58 am 08/28
packen and evariste have also commented
evariste @ large left a comment at 2:59 pm 08/25
evariste left a comment at 12:07 pm 08/25
packen left a comment at 4:18 pm 08/27
evariste, franco cbi, and zorkmidden have also commented
zorkmidden left a comment at 9:07 pm 08/23
kianb, packen, evariste, and papijoe have also commented
kianb left a comment at 5:07 pm 08/22
franco cbi and zorkmidden have also commented
kianb left a comment at 1:17 pm 08/19
franco cbi left a comment at 5:24 am 08/18
evariste is also here
zorkmidden left a comment at 9:28 pm 08/14
packen is also here
franco cbi left a comment at 4:32 am 08/19
packen, evariste, zorkmidden, and evariste @ large have also commented
evariste left a comment at 10:05 am 08/13
franco cbi is also here

State of the Union

I didn’t realize that Matt Drudge had somehow purloined a copy of the State of the Union address and broken the embargo to publish it 40 minutes before President Bush was due to give it. I don’t read Drudge much any more, anyway. I’m down to loading his site once every day or two, lately.

Once again flouting decades of tradition, Internet maverick Matt Drudge broke the gentleman’s agreement last night between the White House and the Washington press corps by posting the full text of the president’s State of the Union address 40 minutes before it was delivered.

Drudge is in the wrong here. There’s no compelling reason to break this speech 40 minutes early—it’s just a manifestation of the mindless, infantile narcissism of a shameless self-promoter. But I guess he’s bragging about it, like he really accomplished something by passing on pilfered material that he had no right to.

Drudge didn’t respond to requests for comment from ABC News this morning but recently has been heard to boast on his Sunday night radio show, “That’s what we do here at the Drudge Report. We break embargoes.”

His suffocating smugness is overbearing. Good for you Matt Drudge. You’ve really done everyone a huge service. Is it really something to crow about that some jerk emailed you the speech and you slapped it on the web? You’re a real gumshoe.

It strikes me that Drudge’s casual violation is—admittedly, not to the same degree—as detrimental to the civic order as when the news media’s notoriously unreliable election-day early exit polls dishearten voters and affect the outcome of the election. The State of the Union address is a national event. Drudge ruined it for personal acclaim. I just don’t see what public interest exists in spoiling it forty minutes early. Of course, there isn’t one-why am I looking for it in his actions, when Drudge, himself, didn’t weigh it for a moment? The White House offers the press corps advance copies of the speech as a courtesy; I expect that will soon stop—especially if the speech about to be given is in any way exciting. So Drudge may have spoiled it for all of you in the oldline media. I’m not shedding any tears for you, though.

Perhaps I’m making too much of this Drudge thing. It rankled. Onward.

Not that I was watching the State of the Union. Like many Americans, I don’t want to hear what George W Bush has to say any more. He’s talking, but not many are listening. On the other hand, China Confidential was listening, and his take on it buoyed my dragging spirits somewhat. He says:

The good news about President Bush’s State of the Union speech is that he put nuclearizing Islamist Iran and its murderous Shiite Lebansese proxy Hezbollah on the same level as Al Qaeda.

The bad news is that he repeated nonsense about crusading for democracy in Iraq, where, contrary to the President’s assertion, “the people” have proven that they don’t want to live in peace and actually prefer psycho-sectarian bloodshed.

That said, the good news outweighs the bad, in our view. The President signaled that Tehran’s days are numbered: the turbaned tyranny is slated for elimination.

Eager to see whether Confidential Reporter was reading the tea-leaves too optimistically, I read the speech for myself.

In recent times, it has also become clear that we face an escalating danger from Shia extremists who are just as hostile to America, and are also determined to dominate the Middle East. Many are known to take direction from the regime in Iran, which is funding and arming terrorists like Hezbollah — a group second only to al Qaeda in the American lives it has taken.

Hezbollah terrorists, with support from Syria and Iran, sowed conflict in the region and are seeking to undermine Lebanon’s legitimately elected government.

In Iraq, […] Radical Shia elements, some of whom receive support from Iran, formed death squads.

If American forces step back before Baghdad is secure, the Iraqi government would be overrun by extremists on all sides. We could expect an epic battle between Shia extremists backed by Iran, and Sunni extremists aided by al Qaeda and supporters of the old regime. [ed: hmm, sounds good to me]

The United Nations has imposed sanctions on Iran, and made it clear that the world will not allow the regime in Tehran to acquire nuclear weapons.

6 mentions of Iran in 2006, 2 related to its nuclear ambitions. Only 5 mentions, only one of which related to nuclear ambitions this year. I’m not perceiving a burning urgency to deal with Iran. I am amazed that he mentioned the worse-than-useless “Quartet”, harped on the goal of a “Palestinian state”, and kept calling countries like China and Russia “partners”. I guess I didn’t miss much of importance by missing the speech.

What did you think of it?

Posted by evariste on Jan 25, 2007 6:00 am

no comments yet

recent comments

[ #9 ]/ packen I got sick and tired of long hair and chopped it off
[ #7 ]/ zorkmidden: I just finished watching the first episode and I like it. Thanks for the tip.
Or Amazon Primetime as I call it...
[ #5 ]/ packen: Btw, have you checked out "Extant", with Halle Berry? There's a new episode on Amazon
[ #5 ]/ packen I'm ashamed to admit that I've never seen a live Redbox, but apparently
I'm ashamed to admit that I've never seen a live Redbox, but apparently there is one at my local supermarket.
Aww... I too was hoping for elves! I do so love my Redbox though. Even if I can only
The BF and I used MSN to keep in touch until we switched to Facebook chat about two years ago.
No enslaved elves? I went to an FYE earlier this week. They are the successor to Sam Goody and
The spindle must rotate at the speed of 0.2 RPM, because it takes it five minutes to accept each DVD
This'll titillate zorkie.
So long. [img] [img]
Next time just go and grab a menu instead of waiting. And if it takes long, you need to remind
I'm 5'9 1/2", shoe size 10C. My arms, particularly my forearms, are long.
LOL at yous.
[ #4 ]/ evariste: I'm afraid to measure. If my foot is as big as my forearm, I must
Whatever, Littlefoot.
[ #2 ]/ franco cbi My foot is 2" shorter than my forearm Freak.
My foot is only like half an inch shorter than my forewarm (wrist to elbow). Had no idea, my forearm
Four Elements: Earth, Air, Fire and Water. Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Pestilence, War, Famine, Death. Hurricane or
Very close! My foot is 2" shorter than my forearm when measured from the tip of my elbow, 1" longer
Holy shit.
I know! What's next, a flood?
My boyfriend is away in the army, and my ex showed up drunk. He got really rough and we ended
Poor zorkie... First Ebola, then earthquake.

home

this & that

bloggie pulse: circulation
last 15 minutes:
26
last hour:
61
last 24 hours:
639
bloggie pulse: comments
since midnite:
0
last 24 hours:
2
in our lifetime:
5783