friday, july 21, 2017 1:41 am zst

people in glass houses sink ships


Software Testing Training in Chennai left a comment at 7:56 am 07/20
HSc Result 2017 left a comment at 4:55 pm 07/19
Quicken Support left a comment at 10:23 pm 07/18
Dot Net Training in chennai left a comment at 10:24 pm 07/17
mirnalinisathya1327 left a comment at 2:29 pm 07/17
Megabox HD for iPad left a comment at 8:02 am 07/19
Root Master Apk Download left a comment at 11:56 am 07/18
replica uk left a comment at 6:21 am 07/19
dash12 is also here

Sharon's Stillborn Coup D'Etat

In The Escape Artist, Gershom Gorenberg details some disturbing suppressed history in Israel.

The report that General Ariel Sharon proposed a coup d’état in May 1967, like so much else we have heard about the man, is both shocking and utterly unsurprising. No one in Israel has a longer record of ignoring rules and authority.
He's still a heroic figure to me, a great man. And I wasn't even born at the time.

The account of the coup proposal comes from Dr. Ami Gluska, a reserves colonel and ex-security official, in a doctoral thesis published by the Defense Ministry’s press, as reported by Ha’aretz. Gluska’s documentation is Sharon’s testimony, after the Six-Day War, to the army’s own history department. The information’s provenance raises a tangential but disturbing issue: the way the government and army forbid publication of historic material, then open the door to insider researchers. Usually that insures that history is written to fit the establishment narrative. Occasionally, an insider spills an upsetting piece of the past.

Sharon’s proposal to dispense with democracy came during what’s remembered in Israel as the Waiting, the days after Egypt moved its army into the Sinai in mid-May 1967. Top generals, including chief of staff Yitzhak Rabin, wanted to attack before Egypt did. The cabinet was divided between those who agreed, and those who wanted to give a last chance to diplomacy. At a May 28 meeting, the cabinet narrowly chose restraint.

In Sharon’s testimony to the history department, he reportedly explained that he’d always believed a military takeover "couldn’t happen" in Israel. But after the May 28 meeting, Sharon -- then commander of a division -- allegedly told Rabin and other generals that "for the first time a situation has been created where the thing could happen and would be well received." The goal would not be for the army to govern, he explained, but only to make the decision to go to war. Sharon claimed that he couldn’t remember if Rabin agreed or not, "but I think it looked like that to him too."

On June 2, the brass met again with prime minister Levi Eshkol and senior ministers, who chose to wait a bit longer. Afterward, Sharon again allegedly raised with the other generals the idea that that "at a certain stage, we get up," order the cabinet into a closed room, and have Rabin broadcast to the nation "an announcement." (The actual, democratic decision to go to war came shortly after.)
So Sharon's alliance of convenience with Labor against his own party to implement disengagement and silence dissent isn't exactly novel or uncharacteristic, according to the article.
Interestingly, ben Gurion called Sharon a liar in his diaries.
Normally, one wouldn’t depend on Sharon as a historical source, since his capacity for prevarication is well documented. Prime minister David Ben-Gurion, in a 1960 entry in his diary, said of Sharon: "Were he to rid himself of his faults of not speaking the truth… he would be an exceptional military leader." Ben-Gurion stood behind Sharon even after the young commander led the infamous 1953 attack on the West Bank village of Qibiya, in which his force killed some 70 civilians. Ben-Gurion remained his sponsor after the 1956 Sinai war, in which Sharon ignored orders, pushed a battalion into the Mitla Pass, and caused the unnecessary death of 38 Israeli soldiers. Ben-Gurion thought Sharon was "an original, visionary young man." Sharon implemented his aggressive policies, and it seems Ben-Gurion considered him the avatar of the daring young Sabra. But he knew that the man lied, regularly, often.

In the 1967 story, though, Sharon’s testimony is against himself. The published bits have the tone of someone who expected someone else to tell the story, and so wanted to give his version. His claim that Rabin saw things as he did is speculation without evidence. The safest evaluation is that Sharon twice suggested to the country’s military leaders that they seize power, and that the other generals ignored him or said no.

Sadly, this isn’t a vindication of Rabin. The question is why, even after the war was safely won, he allowed Sharon to stay in the army. Add that to the question of how Ben-Gurion remained Sharon’s patron after Qibiya and Mitla. Then there’s the question of why Pinhas Sapir, kingmaker of the Labor Party, wanted to run Sharon as the party’s candidate for Tel Aviv mayor in 1969. And the problem of how Sharon evaded a court martial for "exceeding authority" and expelling thousands of Beduin from their homes in the Sinai in 1972 (see "Sharon’s Bulldozers, Then and Now," April 5, 2004). And finally, there’s the problem of how the Likud stuck with Sharon after he misled the nation into the disastrous Lebanon War and was found by a commission of inquiry to bear "personal responsibility" for the Sabra and Shatilla massacre. Sharon’s motto, "The dogs bark and the caravan keeps going," is an unintended indictment of our politics.
I think disengagement is good policy in Gaza. But I'm profoundly uncomfortable with the way Sharon is going about it, and this doesn't ease my fears any.

Posted by evariste on Nov 28, 2004 7:47 pm

1 comment

#1 John Martin at 12:30 pm on May 08, 2017

The bureau was isolated among the individuals who concurred, and the individuals who needed to give a last opportunity to strategy Write My Assignment Cheap. The distributed crumb has the tendency of somebody who anticipated that another person would recount the narrative, thus needed to give his variant.

recent comments

Enterprises that procedure farming items. ie: sustenance handling, or a manufacturing plant that transforms straw into fuel pellets. [ assignment
Students who have just started their college and asked to write big assignments face many problems due to lack of
thank you for your interesting infomation. skmei watches ]/
SAP Training Institute Delhi provides real time and placement focused on Best SAP FICO Training in Delhi includes basic to
I love the way you write and share your niche! Very interesting and different! Keep it coming! slate roof
Aster HR IT Training is one of the best software testing training institute in chennai with placement, we offer
The watch is available for [ designer replica handbags ]/ sale in a limited edition of 2,017 pieces. The 45mm
The physical verification part of the process is really [ cheap ray ban ]/ essential, our team is composed of
Among the fashion label’s problems, MKM highlights the reduction in [ omega replica ]/ merchandise, the lack of on-trend smaller
Michael Kors has been grappling with plummeting sales [ ralph lauren outlet uk ]/ and tepid profits after a rapid
This season’s chic leather offerings come with much more [ christian louboutin outlet uk ]/ palatable names to integrate with
HSC Result 2017 All Education Board Bangladesh will Publish 23 July 2017. Get Fast your HSC Exam Result by following
HSC Result 2017 All Education Board Bangladesh will Publish 23 July 2017. Get Fast your HSC Exam Result by following
Well, there are a lot of pluses and minuses about Islam revolutions in Iran and other countries. I was looking
Digital Marketing is the top trending certification in business world, the person who expertise in Digital Marketing techniques can confidently
[ hair styles boys 2017 ]/
[ high fade haircut ]/
[ strong hair with bangs 2016 ]/
[ hair styles boys wallpaper ]/
[ types of fade haircuts ]/
[ long hair with bangs and layers ]/
[ best brand apple ]/
[ click on result ]/
[ Automatic blood pressure monitor ]/
[ Automatic blood pressure monitor ]/


this & that

bloggie pulse: circulation
last 15 minutes:
last hour:
last 24 hours:
bloggie pulse: comments
since midnite:
last 24 hours:
in our lifetime: